Placement Report

Global Results 1 - Comprehensive Report

📊 Global Results 1

Comprehensive Educational Performance Analysis
962 Students Analyzed
November 11, 2025

📊 Performance Dashboard

48.0%
Grammar
58.0%
Reading
56.0%
Listening
49.0%
Writing
67.0%
Speaking
💡 Key Insight: Speaking scores lead at 67.0%, indicating strong oral communication. Grammar (48.0%) and writing (49.0%) require immediate intervention.

👥 Teacher Performance Analysis

💡 Analysis: 7 teachers show significant performance variation. Top performers should mentor others. Identify and replicate successful teaching strategies.

📚 Results by Grade

💡 Grade Analysis: Middle School performs best with 58.2% overall. Primary School needs focus with 51.4%. Each grade requires customized teaching approaches based on developmental stage and prior knowledge.

📚 Grade-Level Skills Profile

💡 Profile Insight: This radar visualization shows skill patterns per grade. Identify grade-specific strengths to leverage and weaknesses requiring intervention.

📊 Results by Class - CE4 Level

💡 CE4 Class Analysis: 5 classes in CE4. CE4/3 performs best (50.8%), CE4/1 needs support (32.8%). Performance gap: 18.0%. Priority: Listening workshops for all CE4 classes (30.6% avg). Strength to leverage: Speaking (62.4%).

📊 Results by Class - CE5 Level

💡 CE5 Class Analysis: 5 classes in CE5. CE5/3 performs best (63.8%), CE5 /1 needs support (43.4%). Performance gap: 20.4%. Priority: Listening workshops for all CE5 classes (37.6% avg). Strength to leverage: Speaking (72.2%).

📊 Results by Class - CE6 Level

💡 CE6 Class Analysis: 6 classes in CE6. CE6 /3 performs best (71.4%), CE6 /1 needs support (47.8%). Performance gap: 23.6%. Priority: Listening workshops for all CE6 classes (45.2% avg). Strength to leverage: Reading (72.2%).

📊 Results by Class - 1AC Level

💡 1AC Class Analysis: 8 classes in 1AC. 1AC/ANG performs best (67.4%), 1AC/6 needs support (41.6%). Performance gap: 25.8%. Priority: Grammar workshops for all 1AC classes (46.3% avg). Strength to leverage: Speaking (66.1%).

📊 Results by Class - 2AC Level

💡 2AC Class Analysis: 9 classes in 2AC. 2AC/ANG performs best (70.6%), 2AC/6 needs support (47.6%). Performance gap: 23.0%. Priority: Writing workshops for all 2AC classes (50.0% avg). Strength to leverage: Listening (68.3%).

📊 Results by Class - 3AC Level

💡 3AC Class Analysis: 7 classes in 3AC. 3AC/ANG performs best (74.6%), 3AC/5 needs support (51.0%). Performance gap: 23.6%. Priority: Writing workshops for all 3AC classes (53.7% avg). Strength to leverage: Listening (75.6%).

Initial AI Analysis

Executive Summary

The dataset provides a comprehensive overview of the academic performance of 962 students across various grades and classes. The average scores for Grammar, Reading, Listening, Writing, and Speaking are 48%, 58%, 56%, 49%, and 67%, respectively. The data highlights significant variations in performance across different teachers, with the top 3 performers achieving average scores of 56% (Grammar), 61% (Reading), 71% (Listening), 51% (Writing), and 73% (Speaking), while the bottom 3 performers scored 38% (Grammar), 52% (Reading), 35% (Listening), 42% (Writing), and 71% (Speaking). The Middle School students outperformed the Primary School students in most skills.

Key Metrics Overview

  • Total students: 962
  • Average scores:

    • + Grammar: 48%
    + Reading: 58%
    + Listening: 56%
    + Writing: 49%
    + Speaking: 67%

  • Minimum and maximum scores:

    • + Grammar: 0% - 100%
    + Reading: 0% - 100%
    + Listening: 0% - 100%
    + Writing: 0% - 100%
    + Speaking: 30% - 105%

    Teacher Comparison

    Top 3 performers:
    + BEN TALEB ABDERAHIM (142 students): avg. Grammar: 56%, avg. Reading: 61%, avg. Listening: 71%, avg. Writing: 51%, avg. Speaking: 73%
    + ISSAM AMFZAGH (117 students): avg. Grammar: 51%, avg. Reading: 61%, avg. Listening: 70%, avg. Writing: 52%, avg. Speaking: 65%
    + HALIMA MIRBAH (143 students): avg. Grammar: 51%, avg. Reading: 54%, avg. Listening: 68%, avg. Writing: 50%, avg. Speaking: 64%

    Bottom 3 performers:
    + LOUBNA AIT KHARSA (201 students): avg. Grammar: 38%, avg. Reading: 52%, avg. Listening: 35%, avg. Writing: 42%, avg. Speaking: 71%
    + ZINEB EL KHATERI (59 students): avg. Grammar: 40%, avg. Reading: 58%, avg. Listening: 36%, avg. Writing: 48%, avg. Speaking: 55%
    + IKRAM HADDI (156 students): avg. Grammar: 49%, avg. Reading: 51%, avg. Listening: 63%, avg. Writing: 48%, avg. Speaking: 63%

    Grade Progression

    The Middle School students outperformed the Primary School students in most skills.

  • Middle School (567 students):

    • + avg. Grammar: 51%
    + avg. Reading: 57%
    + avg. Listening: 67%
    + avg. Writing: 50%
    + avg. Speaking: 66%

  • Primary School (395 students):

    • + avg. Grammar: 42%
    + avg. Reading: 60%
    + avg. Listening: 39%
    + avg. Writing: 47%
    + avg. Speaking: 69%

    Skill Area Deep Dive

  • Grammar:

    • + Average: 48%
    + Minimum: 0%
    + Maximum: 100%
    + Distribution: The scores are spread out, with a few students scoring very high and many scoring low.

  • Reading:

    • + Average: 58%
    + Minimum: 0%
    + Maximum: 100%
    + Distribution: The scores are relatively evenly distributed, with a few students scoring very high and a few scoring very low.

  • Listening:

    • + Average: 56%
    + Minimum: 0%
    + Maximum: 100%
    + Distribution: The scores are spread out, with a few students scoring very high and many scoring low.

  • Writing:

    • + Average: 49%
    + Minimum: 0%
    + Maximum: 100%
    + Distribution: The scores are spread out, with a few students scoring very high and many scoring low.

  • Speaking:

    • + Average: 67%
    + Minimum: 30%
    + Maximum: 105%
    + Distribution: The scores are relatively evenly distributed, with a few students scoring very high and a few scoring very low.

    Trends and Forecasts

    The data suggests that:

  • Middle School students perform better than Primary School students in most skills.
  • The top-performing teachers have higher average scores in all skills.
  • There is a positive correlation between Reading and Speaking scores.

    • Risks and Mitigations

  • Risk: Low-performing students may fall behind their peers.

    • + Supporting data: The average scores for Grammar, Writing, and Listening are below 50%.
    + Recommended mitigation strategy: Provide additional support and resources to low-performing students.

  • Risk: Teachers with low average scores may need additional training or support.

    • + Supporting data: The bottom 3 performers have average scores below 50% in some skills.
    + Recommended mitigation strategy: Provide professional development opportunities for teachers to improve their instructional skills.

    Action Plan Recommendations

    1. Grammar Intensive Program
    * Target: CE4/1, CE4/2 classes (lowest performers)
    * Action: Daily 15-minute grammar games and visual aids
    * Timeline: 8 weeks intensive program
    * Expected Outcome: Raise average from 35% to 55%
    2. Reading Comprehension Program
    * Target: Primary School students
    * Action: Weekly reading comprehension exercises and discussions
    * Timeline: 12 weeks
    * Expected Outcome: Raise average from 60% to 70%
    3. Listening and Speaking Program
    * Target: Middle School students
    * Action: Bi-weekly listening and speaking exercises and role-plays
    * Timeline: 16 weeks
    * Expected Outcome: Raise average from 67% to 75%
    4. Writing Workshop
    * Target: Low-performing students
    * Timeline: 12 weeks
    * Expected Outcome: Raise average from 49% to 60%
    5. Teacher Professional Development
    * Target: Bottom 3 performers
    * Action: Provide professional development opportunities and coaching
    * Timeline: Ongoing
    * Expected Outcome: Improve teacher instructional skills and student outcomes

    Resources Needed

  • Audio equipment (headphones, speakers)
  • Educational materials (games, books, worksheets)
  • External support (trainers, specialists)
  • Teacher development time
  • Assessment tools

Follow-up Questions

1. What are the specific challenges faced by low-performing students, and how can we address them?
2. How can we provide additional support and resources to teachers with low average scores?
3. What are the most effective instructional strategies for improving student outcomes in each skill area?

Business Insights

AI-Powered Educational Analytics

Generated on November 11, 2025 at 3:50 PM

**